Some years later you have built up a huge organization on the principle but the sign on the building still says “COST”. And in the meanwhile you have realized the added burden of handling complexity, communication and controlling quality coming out of a cost-optimized factory. Then someone throws up their hands and says – “you know what, we should have planned it better”
Both yes and no. No because it is likely that your firm did in fact plan all this – just that they chose the wrong core ideas to build their plans on (and perhaps did not think the thing through). Yes, because without a good plan it is likely that you will never understand what you are after. The idea behind planning is to start with a core and build concentric circles around it. The concentric circles are steps to fructify that core. And each outward circle has to be evaluated if it adds to or subtracts from the core (retain if former, discard if latter) In this example, the core could well have been “optimize costs” but it is likely that many concentric circles were allowed even when it was evident they were diluting the core. All plans get a reality check when they hit the asphalt making it even more important to keep a close watch on those concentric circles
The core is equally important when unwinding a bad decision just so one does not wipe out an accretive circle in the process
Sadly, in my experience, especially in outsourcing and breaking ground with new products or setting up businesses in virgin territories I have seen far too many plans with poorly thought out cores. Your experience could well be different. It will be a breath of fresh air to hear about them.