Approach the net

The Championships - Wimbledon 2013: Day ThreeLast evening my wife and I watched a bit of Wimbledon after putting our ten month old to bed. It was Roger Federer playing a rank unknown (later identified at ranked 116) Ukrainian Sergei Stakhovsky. It was the first set that went to a tiebreaker. My wife observed, a bit soulfully, that players these days do not approach the net as often as their counterparts a decade earlier did. Tennis on grass was about serve-and-volley. By the time the final would be played, the center court would sport two prominent bald patches on the otherwise brilliant carpet of green. One patch would span horizontally at the baseline and the other at almost perpendicular along the center service line. The second patch represented the path of risk. It was that line players took to approach the net. At the net they would expose the entire court behind them – a total blindspot. And positioned there, the braveheart would expect to intercept the ball much before a bounce or air friction took the sting out of a return. It forced players to accept a reduced reaction time and a possibility that they might have to dive to reach the ball without having recourse to rising again to play the point. But players went up to the net and accepted all these risks – all for the possibility of meeting the challenge head on and catching their adversaries unawares

Last evening we noticed that Stakhovsky was approaching the net far often than Roger Federer was. He was losing most of the net points but that did not deter him to run up. That’s perhaps what a 116 does when facing a number 3. As sleep deprived parents we went to sleep just after Federer pocketed the first set, half assured that we’ll catch a longer viewing of the next match he played. But then we clearly undermined the rewards of risk taking

In life if you have the opportunity to approach the net, won’t you take it?

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Approach the net

  1. Stefan Edberg is the man would inspired me to watch tennis during my childhood. I still argue that his brand of tennis was the most entertaining and guide book on how to serve and volley.
    It was good to see Stakhovsky do that yesterday. Being a prudent fan of Roger, I stayed awake to watch the conplete match. Very well played Stakhovsky but highly disappointing to see Roger lose. Now this serve and volley maniac should not lose his next round. If you have defeated world # 3 and ensure you go to the semis and play world # 2 there. Don’t take the road of Lukas Rosol (sent Nadal packing for the rest of the season same week last year) and disappear into oblivion. All the best Stakhovsky !!!

  2. A very apt analogy Subrata. Can relate to “running to the net” very much. With a minor change it would reflect our position even better..instead of one Federer if the entire ground were peopled with Federers and they all play against you, simultaneously. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s